On the P vs NP question: a proof of inequality

نویسنده

  • Angelo Raffaele Meo
چکیده

The analysis discussed in this paper is based on a well-known NP-complete problem which is called “satisfiability problem or SAT”. From SAT a new NP-complete problem is derived, which is described by a Boolean function called “core function”. In this paper it is proved that the cost of the minimal implementation of core function increases with n exponentially. Since the synthesis of core function is an NP-complete problem, this result is equivalent to proving that P and NP do not coincide.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Optimal Acceptors and Optimal Proof Systems

Unless we resolve the P vs NP question, we are unable to say whether there is an algorithm (acceptor) that accepts Boolean tautologies in polynomial time and does not accept non-tautologies (with no time restriction). Unless we resolve the co -NP vs NP question, we are unable to say whether there is a proof system that has a polynomial-size proof for every tautology. In such a situation, it is ...

متن کامل

M ay 2 00 8 Independence of P vs . NP in regards to oracle

Previously in “P is a proper subset of NP” [Meek Article 1, 2008] and “Analysis of the Deterministic Polynomial Time Solvability of the 0-1-Knapsack Problem” [Meek Article 2, 2008] the present author has demonstrated that some NP-complete problems are likely to have no deterministic polynomial time solution. In this article the concepts of these previous works will be applied to the relativizat...

متن کامل

Independence of P vs. NP in regards to oracle relativizations

Previously in “P is a proper subset of NP” [Meek Article 1 2008] and “Analysis of the Deterministic Polynomial Time Solvability of the 0-1-Knapsack Problem” [Meek Article 2 2008] the present author has demonstrated that some NP-complete problems are likely to have no deterministic polynomial time solution. In this article the concepts of these previous works will be applied to the relativizatio...

متن کامل

A Dual Version of Reimer's Inequality and a Proof of Rudich's Conjecture

We prove a dual version of the celebrated inequality of D. Reimer (a.k.a. the van den Berg-Kesten conjecture). We use the dual inequality to prove a combinatorial conjecture of S. Rudich motivated by questions in cryptographic complexity. One consequence of Rudich’s Conjecture is that there is an oracle relative to which one-way functions exist but one-way permutations do not. The dual inequali...

متن کامل

Is P Versus NP Formally Independent?

This is a survey about the title question, written for people who (like the author) see logic as forbidding, esoteric, and remote from their usual concerns. Beginning with a crash course on Zermelo-Fraenkel set theory, it discusses oracle independence; natural proofs; independence results of Razborov, Raz, DeMillo-Lipton, Sazanov, and others; and obstacles to proving P vs. NP independent of str...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • CoRR

دوره abs/1802.05484  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2018